You're a 15–50 person SaaS team with no QA — or one manual tester who's underwater. We embed an experienced QA engineer into your workflow who owns testing end to end: documentation, manual coverage, and automation in Playwright + TypeScript.
No long contract. The trial ends with real deliverables — a test plan and your first automated tests running in CI.
We work in your stack
At 15–50 people, product velocity is high and regressions start slipping into production. Hiring a full-time QA lead is slow and expensive. This is the gap we fill.
Developers test their own code. Edge cases and regressions ship to customers, and you find out from support tickets.
Nobody knows what's actually covered. Onboarding a tester or automating anything means starting from zero.
Every deploy is a manual scramble. There's no regression suite, so "did we break anything?" is answered by hoping.
We start with documentation, cover your critical paths manually, then automate the regression and wire it into your pipeline. Here's the sequence.
We audit what exists, write a test plan and test cases for your critical flows, and flag the highest-risk areas.
Test docs & planManual and exploratory testing on core user journeys. Clear, reproducible bug reports your devs can act on immediately.
Manual coverageWe build an E2E suite in Playwright + TypeScript and cover your API, so regressions get caught before release, not after.
Playwright + APITests run automatically on every pull request in GitHub Actions, with Allure reports so the whole team sees what passed.
CI + reportingWant the whole sequence on a real project — plan, live tests, bug reports, dashboards?
See exactly how we work, end to end →Your QA engineer works inside your tools and your standups — not as an outside vendor throwing reports over the wall.
Test plans, test cases, and checklists so coverage is explicit and anyone can pick it up.
Hands-on testing of critical flows with clear, reproducible bug reports.
Maintainable end-to-end suites in Playwright + TypeScript, built for your app.
Contract and integration checks so your backend is verified independently of the UI.
Tests running on every PR in GitHub Actions, gating releases automatically.
Allure reports and a regular readout on quality, coverage, and what's flaky.
We standardize on tools your developers already respect, so the test suite is something your team can own after we're gone.
Prove the value in two weeks before committing to anything ongoing — then an experienced QA engineer embedded in your team, month to month. No per-hour billing, no surprises. Typically a fraction of the fully-loaded cost of an in-house experienced QA hire — without the months-long hiring cycle.
Kick-off within days, not months. See exactly how we work before any ongoing commitment — and walk away with real deliverables either way.
One experienced QA engineer embedded in your team, working in your timezone-overlapping hours. Month to month — no long contract.
We're a fit if you're moving fast, quality is starting to hurt, and hiring a full QA team isn't the right move yet.
Developers are testing their own work and it's not scaling. You need someone who owns quality without a lengthy hire.
You have a manual QA who can't get to automation. We add the automation and process depth alongside them.
Frequent releases mean frequent regressions. You want a safety net in CI, not another manual fire drill each deploy.
We don't publish client names, logos, or case studies — your product gets the same discretion. What we can show is the exact shape of what your team receives from week one:
A complete, interactive walkthrough of our process on a real demo project — the test plan, the tests running in your browser, bug reports, Slack alerts and the full Allure report.
Days, not months. We start with a short kick-off call, get access to your product, and the first deliverables — a test plan and first bug reports — arrive within the first week of the trial.
That's a common setup. We work alongside your tester: they keep owning day-to-day checks while we add test documentation, automation in Playwright + TypeScript, and CI integration — the parts a single manual tester rarely has time for.
You do, from day one. Test cases, Playwright code, and CI configuration live in your repositories and your tools. If we ever part ways, everything keeps working without us.
Like a team member, not a vendor: your Slack, your standups, your sprint board and PR flow, with working hours that overlap US and European time zones.
You decide. Continue month to month with an embedded engineer, take the deliverables and run them in-house, or walk away. The test plan, bug reports, and automated tests from the trial are yours either way.
We sign an NDA before looking at your product, work inside your infrastructure with the minimum access needed, and never move code or data outside your environment.
Our client work is under strict NDAs, so we don't publish names, logos, or case studies — and your product will get the same discretion. What we can share is a complete, public example of our whole process on a demo project — see the live example →. On a call, we'll walk through how we'd set the same up for your product.
Hiring an experienced QA takes months and a full salary plus overhead. We start in days at a fraction of that cost — and if you later decide to build an in-house team, you inherit documented processes and a working automation suite instead of starting from zero.
Book a free 30-minute call. We'll review your release process, show you where bugs are slipping through, and tell you honestly whether a 2-week trial makes sense. No commitment.
Pick a time that works for you — the call takes 30 minutes, no prep needed.
QA Leap